Although having said that in Linda Foster has a lousy character who is inconsistent and spends part of the movie being carried around unconscious as if she was in a "King Kong" movie. In fact this storyline features the movies 3 strongest performances with both Tim Robbins and John Turturro delivering interesting characters whilst Jodie Foster is so natural in her delivery. It may not be the most original of ideas but with several disturbing scenes including a shocking penguin scene it grabs your attention. The main storyline to "Five Corners" which is the return of Heinz looking to have Linda is not a bad one because it has a diversity of characters from the dangerous Heinz to the now passive Harry. The trouble is that Harry has tried to change and he is no longer a fighter and whilst willing to help Linda is now all about the love. ) who saved her when Heinz tried to rape her. The reason for his incarceration is Linda ( Jodie Foster - Candleshoe) who he tried to rape and still has a thing for but she is well aware of his return and whilst her on-off boyfriend James (Todd Graff) wants to protect her she goes to speak to Harry ( Tim Robbins - Top Gun Having been released from prison Heinz ( John Turturro - The Color of Money) returns to The Bronx with things to settle as time inside has done nothing to calm him other than make him realise who he is. In fact whilst that is what "Five Corners" is about it is only part of a whole mixing pot of ideas, characters, drama and humour which makes for a more curious rather than quirky movie. It was very much the simple fact that it starred Jodie Foster, Tim Robbins and John Turturro that made me want to watch as the simple synopsis of a former criminal returning from prison looking for revenge did little to entice me. Republicans won the first round - actually getting it on the ballot.Despite starring 3 of my favourite actors I'd never heard of "Five Corners" which made me feel a bit wary as if I haven't heard of a movie from the 80s the chances are it's not going to be that good. In truth, everyone involved in Proposition 70 was crafting a proposal as much about raw politics as public policy. Xavier Becerra, doesn’t make it sound very appealing: “Limits Legislature’s Authority To Use Cap-and-Trade Revenue To Reduce Pollution.” Fact check: Not necessarily, as long as two-thirds of each legislative house agrees on a spending plan. The official ballot title, written by the office of state Atty. And the state party is officially opposed to Proposition 70. To challenge the need for the ballot measure, his fellow Democrats have brought out the big guns, like billionaire environmental activist Tom Steyer who argues it “would let a small group of politicians who have opposed our successful clean air strategies derail progress on climate change and pollution reduction.” Fact check: Given the challenges of getting a supermajority consensus, delayed action on spending the money is a real possibility.Įnvironmental groups and some Democratic legislators also have signed the voter guide’s opposition statements. The climate change law will stay on the books even if this side deal is rejected by voters. “Proposition 70 safeguards California’s historic climate change program,” Brown wrote in a passage also signed by the president of the California Chamber of Commerce and the GOP lawmaker who helped strike the deal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |